Hello everybody, Paul Shala here I’m going to show you a new concept and this is a powerful way of being able to make sense of the difference between linear income and leveraged income. Linear income is the idea based on an old way of thinking, working 40 to 50 years for somebody else.
So I’m going to show you a concept by comparing two timelines. I want you to just think about this and see if this makes sense for you. It makes sense for me, and it has for most people so let’s see if this makes sense for you?
First timeline, zero to 22 years old. You’re in the education phase, you’re going to school and you’re learning how to contribute to society. At 22 years old you’re going to step into the workforce. Then you actually go out and hold the job or do something that you can actually provide a value in the workforce. We can also all agree that we will work for about 40 to 50 years for someone else.
At around age 72, for those of you that are under the age of 39, because Social Security won’t kick in for you until age 72, and more likely than not, you won’t even have Social Security by that time. Assuming though that you do, 72 years old seems to be the benchmark where people start to think about retiring. Today’s average life expectancy in America is 78 years old. That means you then only have a window of six years where you have the ability to live your life. And what I mean by live your life, you have money coming in, whether you’re actually working or not, and you also have the freedom and choice to do whatever you want with whomever you want and live where ever you want. That’s true freedom. So people are really willing to work for 40 to 50 years to obtain this.
Linear Vs Leverage Income
Now how does that timeline look?
Is it positive?
Is it exciting?
Is it motivating?
Are you excited to step out and go into the work environment?
Well, when actually put that way, it’s sound quite depressing.
So I’m going to show you a different way of thinking.
- For things to change, you have to change.
- For things to get better, you have to get better. Here’s a new concept, a new Timeline. Zero to 22 you’re in that educating phase, but at the age of 22, you now step into the power of entrepreneurship, owning your own business. When you step into the power of entrepreneurship, you’re going to hustle for three to five years. Work crazy.
Be willing to do what others won’t so you can enjoy what others can’t. I’ll repeat that.
And if you do this right and hustle for three to five years, you literally have the ability to live the rest of your life. Because in this type of hustling, you’re creating an asset that pays you every month, whether you work or not. That means you literally gain freedom, potentially in your 20s, to where that check will come whether you work or not. That’s the value and idea behind this.
So between the two timelines, which one appeals to you more?
Not a difficult answer, I would think.
Most people would agree that the second timeline looks a lot better. I’m going to explain to you how this works: The difference between linear income versus leveraged income.
Linear income is where you are trading time for money, most people are familiar with hourly wages or salary, or commission but in all cases you are the one working. You go out and perform, you get paid, and you’re only as good as your next sale. Most people are familiar with that. This is 100% your effort.
Now in this linear model, working 40 hours a week is pretty standard and normal. If you get a couple of weeks off annually, you end up working 50 weeks in the course of a year. If you did that for 40 years, you would create, or you would put out 90,000 hours over the course of your lifetime to create your lifestyle. Now that is all most people know and do.
Robert Hollis Network Marketing Guru
Leveraged income operates differently. In this concept, we are going to identify people who agree that the second timeline looks better than the first timeline, and here we start to assemble a team of people who want something different. Just like a video can go viral, would you agree that a new concept can also go viral? We’ve seen it over and over and over again. We start to duplicate and create an organization, a movement, a team that recognizes that this system is better than the original system.
Linear Vs Leverage Income
Through this process of organizing the team, beginning with at least five people and duplicating at least 6 levels then Let’s say everybody on the team agrees to work only 4.5 hours per week, Rather than working 40 hours a week. So in this type of a model, if everyone on the team agrees to do that, that would create 20,000 team members working 4.5 hours doing 90,000 hours a week in productivity.
So would you rather have 90,000 hours of productivity per week, or 90,000 hours of time exchanged by you alone over a lifetime?
Now the reason why this is so powerful is because remember, this is 100% you versus leveraging 1% of 100 other people’s efforts. It’s everybody working together. Companies are willing to pay out royalty commissions to people who assemble distribution teams where products and services can move freely.
Now watch how this example works.
Linear Vs Leverage Income
If you created this team … If all these team members, that’s 20,000 members, produced a minimum of $100 a month in products /services sold through this distribution business, that’s 20,000 people with $100 a month. That would be $2 million in a course of a month of products/services that are being sold through your entire distribution team and the company pays a 5% royalty to you on the whole $2 million, that means you would receive $100,000 per month in residual income. This is the power of assembling a team.
Now that might seem like some pretty high numbers, and it is, but the benefit of this is not only in the numbers but also you’re not being dictated to or controlled by anyone or anything.
The benefit of creating this kind of income and this kind of wealth is that it gives you the ability to have time; It gives you the ability to eliminate the need to worry about money. You don’t have to worry about what kind of a house you have, what kind of a car you drive or where you live. Whatever company you work for, they tell you what your value is. This here is a completely different concept. This model doesn’t tell you when you need to show up for work and how to carve out a little bit of time for yourself on the weekends.
That’s why the heart attack rates go up on Monday mornings because people are going to work. And that’s also the reason why we have a higher increase statistically of car accidents on the interstates on Friday afternoons. It’s because people want to get to the weekend to enjoy their freedom. They have that little moment of time of freedom.
So the first timeline, the old system is more of a controlled environment. I call that slavery. You don’t get to pick and choose. But over here the second timeline, you have what I call freedom. Complete, true independence. Monday morning looks no different than a Saturday morning when you live over here. It’s like six Saturdays and one Sunday a week. That’s the concept. So that’s the idea. The difference between the first timeline, the linear concept and the second timeline is leverage. If this has value to you, we want to share and talk with you about how we assemble our team. Posted By Paul Shala
Contact Us http://usaPlanb.net
UsaPlanB 